Science Oxygenwww.ScienceOxygen.com
|
Rational Numbers
Definition ( Rational Number ) If a number can be represented as , where p, q Z, and p 0, then we call it a rational number.
Usually, we use Q to stand for the set of all rational numbers.
Example : is not a rational number. Proof: Assume is a rational number. Thus, we can have = , p, q Z and p, q are relatively prime ( gcd ( p, q) = 1 )
p = q
We square both sides : 2p2 = q2
p and q are integers 2 | q . So, we can write q = 2k where k is an integer .
2p2 = (2k)2 2p2 = 4k2 p2 = 2k2 and p, k are integers 2 | p
2| q, 2 | p but gcd( p, q ) =1
We get contradiction here . Thus, the original statement does not hold.
So, we conclude that is not a rational number.
Theorem : For any rational numbers p, q ( p> q) , we can find a rational number t such that
q < t < p
Proof:
We only need to set t = ( p + q ) .
Claim 1: t= ( p + q ) is a rational number . p , q are rational numbers So, t is also a rational number by multiplying the denominators of p and q by 2.
Claim 2: t < p p – t = p - ( p + q ) = ( p + p ) - ( p+ q) = ( p –q ) > 0 So, p > t.
Claim 3: t > q t – q = ( p + q ) – q = ( p + q ) - ( q + q ) = ( p – q ) > 0 So, t > q
Thus, we prove that q < t < p , where t is also a rational number.
This theorem states that you always can find a rational number between two rational numbers. But it is still not “dense” enough. Consider the following diagram:
Is it possible that the rational numbers can cover all the space between 1 and 2 on that line segment ?
The answer is no – because you know that is between 1 and 2, but it is not a rational number. You know the length between 1 and 2 is 1 and you might want to ask the length occupied by all the rational numbers between 1 and 2. That kind of measure problem will be explored in more advanced math.
|