Science Oxygenwww.ScienceOxygen.com
|
Exponent – Fraction Exponent and Square Root
Motivation:
We have seen something like 20 or 2-1 in previous topic. Let’s explore more on it. Consider the following expression
(23)2
What does it mean ? From the basic definition,
(23)2 = 23 23 = 2 2 2 2 2 2 = 26
But what does it mean when fraction appears in exponent? Like
21/2, 21/3, …
Similarly, if we hope the following rule still holds for fraction exponent, we have (21/2)2 = 21 = 2
In other words, 21/2 is one of the solutions of the following problem
$2 = 2
Since 20 =1 and 21=2, 21/2 should sit between 1 and 2. And that is also the reason why we would like to define the symbol for square root.
Definition ( Square Root ) If b 0, we define as the positive square root of b.
Why we say “positive square root” ? The reason is ( )( ) = b And (- )(- ) = b
and - are both square roots of b. And is exactly b1/2 .
In general, we have the symbol , where n is an positive integer such that n>1 .
And it has the relationship ( )n = p
While n = 2, we just omit the writing for 2. And is equivalent to p1/n .
Example: And ( )3 = -2.
We will introduce more on this while introducing radicals. We just focus on fraction exponent here first.
Now, we consider (ap)q .
When p, q are integers, we are pretty sure that (ap)q = apq .
When p is fraction and q is integer, the relation (ap)q = apq also holds.
What if p is integer and q is fraction? Let’s take a look at it from simple example.
(22)1/2 = 41/2 = 2 (21/2)2 = ( )2 = 2 So, (22)1/2 = 21/2)2 = 2 . It seems that (ap)q = apq also holds. We can think in this way: the commutative rule for multiplication should hold even when they appear on the exponent. In other words, apq = aqp . So, if the relationship (ap)q = apq holds when p is fraction and q is integer, this relation should also hold when p is integer and q is fraction. Otherwise, the commutative law for multiplication would not hold.
Thus, we have the following property or theorem.
Theorem: (ap)q = apq , p, q are rational numbers.
|